Monday, August 24, 2015

July 26, 2015AD


No Picnic in the Park

Who doesn't like a b-b-q or a picnic once in a while? That is one of the reasons why today’s Gospel appeals to so many folks. Another reason is that this is the only miracle of Jesus that is mentioned on all four gospels, twice each in St Mark and St Matthew. There is every probability that Jesus hosted mass gatherings more than once.

There is a frequent pattern that recurs in these stories. First, the need, then the loaves and fish are taken, blessed, broken, distributed and the fragments are gathered up so that nothing goes to waste.

People around the Mediterranean know themselves as mangia molto cultures of food. However, back in Jesus' day, a patriarchal culture had determined with whom one could eat. One ate with one's family and one's most intimate friends. The rare time that one might with strangers was when one was. Traveling and staying at an inn. No McDonalds or Taco Bells back then!

This makes the miracles even more difficult for people back then to process what Jesus is doing. By breaking down the barriers between whom one could eat, Jesus was shaking up the religious protocols of the time. People are hungry, so we feed them. Then, too, Jesus upset the Roman protocols of no mass gatherings, in which people are seated orderly. Why the organization out in the wilderness? Is this Jesus up to something? And what is the talk of making Him a king? Pilate will take care of that on Good Friday.

They are many aspects of this popular and familiar Gospel with which we can relate. However, these days with Pope Francis' encyclical, we might focus a little more closely on the collection of the fragments. No wasting food here!

Pope Francis, coming from Argentina, is well aware of the good life that so many people live. In Argentina, for example, every possible cut of meat is used for food. Very little gets wasted. However, the out of sight, out of mind framework concerning the ones with less abundant food, many peoples otherwise have a less clarified view. Despite the fact that many have learned the familiar adage, "waste not, want not", we don't make the waste of food the priority that we should.

Catholic respect for food consumption goes back to the Christian Scriptures. We hear about the common table shared in the Acts of the Apostles and St Paul's letters. We hear, in imitation of Jesus, the Jesus Movement wasted no food. St John Chrysostom, in the fourth century, "Whenever food is thrown away, it is a crime against the poor."

Even, enemies of the Jesus Movement commented, in the same fourth century, "These Christians not only feed their own poor. They feed our poor as well."

Pope Francis makes the striking and scandalous observation in the encyclical that one third of processed food is discarded in more affluent cultures. He might have been the one who coined the expressions, throwaway culture, the normalization of excess, and also, the culture of indifference. As a willful child says today, "I want what I want and I want it now."

Yes, waste of food is a Catholic issue because it is a human is sure. We proclaim that all people have the right to life. Logical and honest people add on that if we all have a right to life, then we have a right to both potable water and nourishing food.

To throw away food in a world where so many are dying of hunger each day, 25,000 comes to mind, the inter-connectedness of reality points out the scandal of wasting food. One Irish priest in the area makes it a point never to leave either potatoes or rice on a plate after a meal because of a remind that in the eighteen forties, his ancestors were dying in the Great Hunger of the potato famine, for what we throw away. The saving of rice is an expression of solidarity with people today want for the rice which so many casually throw away.

As a spokesperson for the silent poor, Pope Francis continues a prophetic call to see all reality as interrelated and connected. Some segments of society wonder why he challenges the affluent, complacent nations of the world. Others think differently.   To blame population growth solely for hunger is to legitimize the present model of distribution, where a minority believes that it has the right to consume in a way which can never be universalized, since the planet could not even contain the wasted products of such consumption." He also speaks of days not so long ago when he quotes American bishops, "As the USA bishops have said, greater attention must be paid to the needs of the poor, the weak and the vulnerable, in a debate of tern dominated by more powerful interests."

In an ongoing effort at "Catholic quantum economics, the Pope states, "Education in environmental responsibility can encourage ways of acting which directly and significantly affect the world around us, such as avoiding the use of plastic and paper, reducing water consumption, separating the garbage, cooking what only could be reasonably consumed, showing care for other living beings, using public transport or car-pooling, planting trees, turning off unnecessary lights or any number of other practices."

Popes talk now about using public transport, about not wasting food and water, about planting trees and about turning off the lights. We have come a long way from Jesus' collection of the fragments in the loaves after his spontaneous picnics out in the wilderness. Or have we? 072615AD jfq